We planned 100, but the count includes repeat inspections

LiamBrooks0838 · 3 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC

Reply to discussion
LI
LiamBrooks0838
I'm reconciling our batch of 100 for sample verification with Universal Robots UR5e in a fixture inspection station with item labels, using a molded housing. The dashboard looks nearly finished because its post-restart counter includes repeat inspections. Items can have failed checks followed by reviewed retries. I want the accepted-item count to be accurate without discarding that attempt history.

16 replies

LI
LiamAllen0316
Replying to LiamBrooks0838

Can you follow one labelled item through its attempts? Compare successful-attempt count with its actual accepted disposition.

19points
LI
LiamBrooks0838
Replying to LiamAllen0316

I've traced one item in our saved history and found several successful attempts with the same identity. Our counter adds each success, inflating the apparent batch progress.

16points
LI
LiamAllen0316
Replying to LiamBrooks0838

@LiamBrooks0838 Rebuild an offline total from item dispositions, keeping attempts underneath. Counting each accepted identity once should give you the right batch total.

20points
EL
ElenaBennett0775
Replying to LiamAllen0316

@LiamAllen0316 Only if accepted means the current disposition. An item that passed and was later rejected can't stay counted just because it passed once.

6points
LI
LiamAllen0316
Replying to ElenaBennett0775

@ElenaBennett0775 You're right about that missing qualification. Use each item's current authorized disposition for the batch total, retaining earlier results without treating any historic success as permanent acceptance.

10points
LI
LiamBrooks0838
Replying to LiamAllen0316

For an item that fails and then gains reviewed acceptance, should the report count one accepted item while preserving both inspection attempts beneath it?

18points
LI
LiamAllen0316
Replying to LiamBrooks0838

@LiamBrooks0838 Yes. Attempts explain its history; current disposition determines whether that item contributes to accepted quantity.

7points
LE
LeahBell0669
Replying to LiamAllen0316

@LiamAllen0316 My own report showed attempt count separately from accepted-item count, making the reinspection history visible enough to explain why those totals differed.

14points
FA
FarahBrown0939
Replying to LeahBell0669

@LeahBell0669 Does a retry get a new item ID then? Or just a new attempt ID?

17points
LI
LiamAllen0316
Replying to FarahBrown0939

Same physical item, same item identity. The distinct inspection gets its own attempt identity, linked back to that item.

24points
LI
LiamBrooks0838
Replying to LiamAllen0316

The newer entries distinguish item and attempt identity, but some older results lack the item link needed to include them reliably in an accepted-item total.

19points
EL
ElenaBennett0775
Replying to LiamBrooks0838

Avoid inferring unique items solely from event order; those unidentified results might contain repeated attempts against the same physical item.

13points
LI
LiamBrooks0838
Replying to ElenaBennett0775

@ElenaBennett0775 I'll keep the unlinked results explicitly unresolved pending comparison with our physical traceability records, instead of inventing item identities to complete the total.

16points
FA
FarahBrown0939
Replying to LiamBrooks0838

Do unresolved items count as rejected? Otherwise the report's got another number people have to understand.

8points
LI
LiamAllen0316
Replying to FarahBrown0939

Keep them separate. Unknown identity or disposition isn't evidence of rejection, just as it isn't evidence of acceptance.

13points
LE
LeahBell0669
Replying to LiamAllen0316

My batch had a manual counter correction with a note but no item link. It took us a while to stop treating the note as an extra item.

21points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.