the motor housing isn't the whole FR10 load

HanaChen1144 · 15 Mar 2026, 19:15 UTC

Reply to discussion
HA
HanaChen1144
I have two tooling offers based on our motor housing's mass, while the extended fingers, adapter and hose fittings apparently weigh nothing in either calculation. We need to place the housing into an inspection nest. What should I ask each supplier to define before our integrator can compare the actual assemblies?

4 replies

LE
LeoAllen0275
Replying to HanaChen1144

We had a handling comparison where the sample was identified but the adapter was not. Ask for the complete assembly, component masses and centres of mass, held-part position and proposed handling conditions. Your integrator needs the applicable load assessment for that arrangement, not just a part weight detached from the tooling.

22 points
HA
HanaChen1144
Replying to LeoAllen0275

One supplier returned that complete list and the held-housing view. The other repeated the gripper's catalogue capacity and did not include the fingers. I have returned that offer as incomplete.

15 points
AI
AishaBell0692
Replying to HanaChen1144

Our maintenance handover once identified the gripper but not its contact pieces. Include the exact finger and fitting references in the eventual spare list, so a later replacement does not quietly change the assessed assembly.

25 points
LE
LeoAllen0275
Replying to HanaChen1144

And compare access through placement and release into your actual nest, Hana. The load information can be adequate while the tool still cannot leave the housing where you need it.

10 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.