The workshop door changes our trim-plate image

RaviArcher0389 · 8 Mar 2026, 11:32 UTC

Closed
RA
RaviArcher0389
Our physical plate judgements are checked and the raised-support experiment is out of the ordinary reference set, but a bright band still changes in the normal seated view when the workshop door opens; I want to understand that lighting change before someone adds another scratch arrow to our FR10 examples.

10 replies

BR
BrunoArcher0365
Replying to RaviArcher0389

Hold the identified plate and camera setup constant while comparing the door conditions, with the actual setup recorded. Ask the vision engineer whether changing ambient light is entering the scene before tuning around those different images.

18points
NA
NaomiBaker0506
Replying to RaviArcher0389

And include the real rejected plate in that comparison, Ravi, not only the accepted one whose band is annoying you; removing the band is not the whole inspection job.

6points
RA
RaviArcher0389
Replying to NaomiBaker0506

Both included, Naomi; the band changes with the door while the inspected groove stays at its physical location, and the engineer has reproduced that under the recorded setup rather than guessing from my two favourite photographs.

17points
IS
IsabelBennett0735
Replying to RaviArcher0389

Compare a controlled lighting arrangement that works with the ordinary door use. Don't make the operator responsible for remembering to keep a workshop door shut if that is not how the workshop actually runs.

3points
BR
BrunoArcher0365
Replying to IsabelBennett0735

Isabel's point belongs in the operating conditions as well as the optical design. What arrangement has the engineer proposed, Ravi?

18points
RA
RaviArcher0389
Replying to BrunoArcher0365

A defined local screening arrangement around the camera view, with the loader's access and the robot presentation included; I have asked for that whole arrangement assessed, not an instruction to drape something over the bench.

15points
NA
NaomiBaker0506
Replying to RaviArcher0389

Has its cost reached the proposal too, because fixing the scene is useful work but shouldn't be quietly donated by your maintenance person.

5points
RA
RaviArcher0389
Replying to NaomiBaker0506

Included in the revised study price, Naomi; reviewed screening is fitted for the bench comparison and the door-dependent band is now controlled, with our actual groove still visible through repeated presentations.

6points
IS
IsabelBennett0735
Replying to RaviArcher0389

Include representative accepted finish variation and another rejected feature location with quality. That avoids selecting an arrangement which happens to favour only the first two retained plates.

6points
BR
BrunoArcher0365
Replying to RaviArcher0389

Thanks for recording the door condition and the physical-reference result separately. Has that broader comparison finished, or is the improved scene still a candidate rather than a completed inspection?

3points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .