FR10 connector-unloading video lacks the details support keeps requesting

RaviAbbott0041 · 23 Jun 2026, 00:18 UTC

Reply to discussion
RA
RaviAbbott0041
I have already hit the dismissed-message problem on a report. This FR10 connector tray-unloading ticket is 48 days old with our Alibaba seller, and the phone clip still leaves them asking for details. What should we prioritise for a usable occurrence?

11 replies

FA
FarahBarnes0591
Replying to RaviAbbott0041

What happens before the clip begins, Ravi? If it starts with the connector already held, I would want the preceding operation and active step before describing it as a pickup or release fault.

9 points
RA
RaviAbbott0041
Replying to FarahBarnes0591

It begins after the stop. Connector held, message already dismissed. I know the operator had changed the tray earlier, but not whether this was the first unloading after that change.

4 points
JO
JonasBell0633
Replying to RaviAbbott0041

You can send installed program, controller and fixture identities now, with that limited account. For the occurrence, ask the technical contact which retained history may establish the active step and message. If it cannot be recovered, the next normal supervised occurrence needs those details captured before they disappear, not reconstructed from another run.

11 points
AD
AdaBennett0738
Replying to RaviAbbott0041

I would keep tray changed earlier as context only. It does not establish a first-after-change pattern, and the clip does not show whether a release was requested. Those are useful missing questions for support.

13 points
NA
NadiaArcher0378
Replying to RaviAbbott0041

Ask the seller to identify who will read the evidence. I have seen a good report keep circulating because each person assumed somebody else was the technical recipient. A short index helps more than sending the same unlabelled attachments again.

17 points
RA
RaviAbbott0041
Replying to NadiaArcher0378

Sent the installed identities and an index of what the clip does and does not show. Seller still has not named a technical recipient. The exact occurrence message remains unavailable.

11 points
FA
FarahBarnes0591
Replying to RaviAbbott0041

Does your occurrence time identify one retained event or only a broad period? That matters before somebody selects a likely-looking history line and attaches it as the missing message.

-1 points
RA
RaviAbbott0041
Replying to FarahBarnes0591

Only a broad period. Thanks Farah. We found several possible entries and have kept them as candidates rather than choosing the closest-looking one.

5 points
JO
JonasBell0633
Replying to RaviAbbott0041

That is an honest limit. Give the next shift a specific capture request: active step, readable message, fixture and tray identity, and the surrounding action at the occurrence. Include the clocks used so the video and retained history can be compared without silently treating them as synchronised.

2 points
AD
AdaBennett0738
Replying to JonasBell0633

Who on the relief shift has that request? A list in your own notebook will not help if somebody else sees the next stop and dismisses the message before they know why it matters.

14 points
NA
NadiaArcher0378
Replying to RaviAbbott0041

And keep this report open for the technical answer. Better capture instructions improve the next investigation, but they haven't explained what stopped this connector job or confirmed that the seller can use the material already sent.

10 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.