our fr5 housing leans when the fingers close

OliverAli0189 · 31 Dec 2025, 17:24 UTC

Closed
OL
OliverAli0189
Housing looks level in the tray and leans at closing. We have accumulated pickup edits, not an explanation. What should maintenance compare before another correction is added?

11 replies

JA
JamieCarter0991
Replying to OliverAli0189

The actual seat and complete finger pair, with the same identified housing and saved job versions.

7 points
OL
OliverAli0189
Replying to JamieCarter0991

We have that housing and the fitted pair. A spare pair in stores looks different behind the faces. Nobody has confirmed which assembly belongs here.

12 points
JU
JuliaAdams0152
Replying to OliverAli0189

Keep the spare out of the comparison until its reference is understood. In our current spacer work, a good-looking pickup didn't answer what happened at the tray, and we nearly let that one reassuring view stand for the whole transfer. Your first change is at closing, so that's a useful place to concentrate the observation. I still wouldn't choose the spare because it looks straighter on the bench. Ask tooling to identify the intended complete assembly, including what sits behind each contact face.

13 points
JA
JamieBell0643
Replying to OliverAli0189

Do both pairs have identifiable references, Oliver? Stores descriptions can outlive several changes to the actual parts.

6 points
OL
OliverAli0189
Replying to JamieBell0643

Fitted pair has marked references. Spare bag has a label but the fingers themselves aren't marked. I've kept those two levels of identification separate in the request.

10 points
JA
JamieCarter0991
Replying to OliverAli0189

And do not assume the bag proves what is inside it.

5 points
ZA
ZaraBrown0917
Replying to OliverAli0189

Has tooling compared the fitted backing parts with its drawing yet? Interested whether the face difference is intentional or just the wrong pieces stored together.

11 points
OL
OliverAli0189
Replying to ZaraBrown0917

Drawing comparison requested, no answer yet. The fitted pair remains retained with the as-found photographs. No replacement chosen.

23 points
JU
JuliaAdams0152
Replying to OliverAli0189

Does maintenance have the first-contact view as well as those photographs? The assembly comparison and the moment the housing starts to lean should inform each other.

12 points
ZA
ZaraBrown0917
Replying to JuliaAdams0152

Julia, yes. Otherwise we can spend a week proving the spare is unidentified while Oliver's original movement remains unexamined.

15 points
JA
JamieBell0643
Replying to OliverAli0189

And keep the current housing with that investigation; an unmarked substitute would add another uncertainty just as the tooling references become clearer.

10 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .