I have two pictures of the same aluminium bezel, one marked good and one scratched. The bright line changes place. Our FR10 inspection is not commissioned; I need labels our next shift can understand.
I cannot choose scratch labels from these bezel pictures
John_Bowen · 3 Feb 2026, 02:09 UTC
17 replies
Replying to John_Bowen
Find the bezel first. Pictures alone won't settle its condition.
9pointsReplying to John_Bowen
And keep both pictures. The wrong label is useful to explain, even after you correct it.
18pointsReplying to SarahBaker0502
We have the bezel. Quality found a small nick by a hole, but not where either bright line appears. I had expected one fault or the other, not both.
9pointsReplying to John_Bowen
Two separate things, yep. Can the camera actually see that nick?
11pointsReplying to SarahBaker0502
Sarah's question matters more than the shiny line now. Is the nick in the area this inspection is supposed to cover?
23pointsReplying to John_Bowen
I would also ask who assigned the first two labels. A training folder can carry an early guess for months because everyone assumes someone else checked it. That is especially awkward when a new shift treats the folder as the answer key.
11pointsReplying to HenryAli0177
Henry, ours had that. A folder called final. Naturally there were three of them.
15pointsReplying to NinaBennett0762
Sarah and Nina: the nick is in scope and visible, though faint. Henry: I made the labels from the pictures. I will correct them with quality rather than ask the next shift to guess.
18pointsReplying to John_Bowen
When you say the line changes place, John, does it move across the metal or only across the picture? I got caught by that distinction when comparing two parts that were framed differently.
6pointsReplying to ImranArcher0392
Across the metal. It crosses a different hole in the second picture. The nick stays beside the same hole.
12pointsReplying to John_Bowen
That gives you a useful teaching pair: the same physical nick under two presentations, with the changing reflection identified separately. Keep the full images too; close crops can hide the presentation difference you are trying to explain.
18pointsReplying to HenryAli0177
Don't crop out the hole. It's doing useful work here.
17pointsReplying to John_Bowen
Thanks, John. That answers what I was trying to ask. I would still keep a clean bezel beside it, because otherwise your set only teaches people about one damaged part.
13pointsReplying to ImranArcher0392
A clean bezel and a borderline one if quality can supply it. Obvious damage is the easy example.
17pointsReplying to NinaBennett0762
Quality has supplied an accepted bezel with a similar finish. Our corrected pair now shows the nick, not the moving line, as the defect. I have left threshold selection out of this exercise.
21pointsReplying to John_Bowen
Can the next shift locate the nick from your new page without you standing beside them? That would be a useful check on the handover wording.
7pointsReplying to HenryAli0177
And let them say the picture's rubbish if it is.
17pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .