JessBriggs · 14 Mar 2026, 02:26 UTC
Give both teams the actual filled box and the same lower-layer section. Include the complete fingers through release, not just the box in its final position.
2 pointsSent. Tooling had shown solid support beneath the turned positions. Packaging has asked for the real lower layer.
2 pointsDoes the proposed job include returned partial pallets, Jess? Ours changed substantially once dispatch's real returns were included instead of assuming every pallet started empty.
20 pointsNew pallets only. Returned work stays at the existing manual station and is included in the overall staffing estimate.
-4 pointsThat boundary helps. We had an old higher-count drawing survive in a quote after the pattern changed, so make sure the supplier prices the same version packaging is assessing.
5 pointsHave the two teams agreed whether the turned positions can remain?
22 pointsThey cannot remain with this box construction. Straight-row alternative proposed. Its tool withdrawal still needs drawing.
17 pointsWho is costing the lower count and extra pallet changes? The returned-work allowance does not cover that new work automatically.
11 pointsDispatch planner. No final cost yet. Both options on the comparison show their actual status.
8 pointsGood. A rejected pattern and an unfinished alternative are perfectly useful things for purchasing to know.
15 pointsBy creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.