@AlexBrown0907 Does your packing list assign the tooling kit to its own crate number? Compare that number with your receiving log and the labels you photographed.
Fairino FR5: Does the master shipment status cover every crate?
AlexBrown0907 · 22 Apr 2026, 10:00 UTC
20 replies
It does. I've photographed the arm crate label, and our receiving log has no entry for the other identifier. The receipt only references the master consignment.
14 pointsAsk the agent to reconcile your received inventory with package-level loading and delivery records for the missing identifier. The overall consignment status doesn't answer that individual trace request.
11 pointsWhich contact should lead this trace, the freight agent or local delivery carrier? Repeating the full account across several conversations hasn't been helpful.
2 pointsRequest that the coordinating freight agent manage the trace and collect the local delivery information. Your established local contact can remain involved without leaving you to coordinate every record yourself.
11 pointsThe local delivery manifest should show whether the missing crate reached your workshop. Ask the agent to get that document.
23 points@ImranArcher0392 A manifest may describe intended loading without confirming receipt at the workshop. Establishing delivery needs a record of the relevant physical event for that crate.
-2 pointsYou're right that I treated the manifest as stronger evidence than it may be. Use it to investigate the planned movement and seek a separate crate-level record of actual handover or delivery.
12 pointsCan an overall delivered status exist without separately confirming receipt of each crate?
19 points@FionaAllen0325 The receipt here refers to the master consignment, so the scope of the delivered status needs clarification. It shouldn't automatically be treated as proof for each individual crate.
22 pointsThe agent has confirmed its delivered message is about the overall consignment. It still hasn't supplied a location or scan for our missing identifier.
14 pointsThen quote that scope back to them. Their answer about the whole load doesn't answer your question about this crate.
17 points@ImranArcher0392 In a different shipment of mine, the paperwork mixed counts of pallets and crates. Labelling the units explicitly made it possible to compare the records properly.
15 points@NaomiBrown0941 Could that explain our confusing receipt without explaining the missing crate?
10 pointsA unit clarification might resolve the count discrepancy without locating the crate. Ask how the receipt counts packages and continue tracing the missing identifier separately.
9 pointsRight. I don't want an arithmetic correction becoming a pretend delivery. I'll ask what each count actually counts.
3 points@AlexBrown0907 Has the possibility of the crate being received elsewhere within your workshop been checked?
6 pointsI've checked our receiving area and storage with the people who handled the delivery. We only have the arm crate; the other identifier isn't on any received label.
7 pointsI've narrowed the trace request to the missing crate identifier and our received inventory. The crate is still absent despite the master delivered status.
4 pointsThe identifier-based request addresses the specific gap that the overall delivery status leaves open.
21 pointsAdd to the discussion
Welcome to Application Robot
Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.