Why does every FR5 quote leave me another job to price?

TobyBaker0492 · 1 Aug 2025, 05:50 UTC

Closed
TO
TobyBaker0492
I'm helping price an FR5 for putting small cartons into packing inserts. The first offer looked within reach. Then I asked how the cartons arrive at the pickup and got a separate fixture estimate. Asked about changing sizes and got another line. We only run short orders, so I don't expect this to pay for itself by moving quickly for an hour. But I need something I can put beside the other offer without pretending our own fitting and training time is free. Where do you stop asking for detail and allow a sensible contingency?

16 replies

AN
AnilBell0636
Replying to TobyBaker0492

Price the carton presentation first. Put your actual cartons and inserts on the bench and walk through who replenishes what. Cheap way to find work missing from both offers.

12 points
TO
TobyBaker0492
Replying to AnilBell0636

We've walked it through with packing. Both offers leave us filling pickup trays, but only one includes the trays themselves. That's the bit that started this.

18 points
WA
Warren_Bailey
Replying to TobyBaker0492

Then why are you buying trays before anyone has priced feeding straight from the existing packing bench?

22 points
TO
TobyBaker0492
Replying to Warren_Bailey

Warren, that's still an option. One supplier wanted tidy rows for its demonstration and the rows somehow became our proposed production method.

21 points
AN
AnikaBell0682
Replying to TobyBaker0492

And who gets called when those tidy rows aren't tidy? Usually someone already busy.

19 points
AA
AaronAllen0262
Replying to TobyBaker0492

A contingency is reasonable for uncertain fitting time, but not for a whole feeding method you haven't chosen

13 points
JA
JamieArcher0382
Replying to TobyBaker0492

What did packing find slow in the walkthrough? Filling pockets, fetching cartons, or changing the insert? Those observations may help decide which unknown deserves another paid visit.

4 points
PA
PatBailey
Replying to Warren_Bailey

I'd keep manual tray filling in the comparison. Not glamorous, but it might be decent for small orders if you can fill off-line and change a whole tray.

18 points
TH
TheoBrooks0845
Replying to PatBailey

Off-line still needs somebody's time, Pat.

2 points
PA
PatBailey
Replying to TheoBrooks0845

Yes, include it. I meant it needn't leave the robot waiting. At our bench a spare tray helped more than the clever feeder we'd been sketching.

12 points
NA
NathanBarnes0547
Replying to TobyBaker0492

Does either price include teaching your late shift to change carton size without ringing the day person?

19 points
AN
AnitaBailey
Replying to TobyBaker0492

Ask for the exclusions on one page. The cheap quote we inherited excluded commissioning travel. Apparently the integrator was meant to materialise beside the machine

15 points
TO
TobyBaker0492
Replying to NathanBarnes0547

Jamie, filling the narrow pockets was the slow part. Nathan, neither quote names a second shift for training. Thanks for that one; I'm the late person and would rather not become the whole support plan.

19 points
PR
PriyaBennett0742
Replying to TobyBaker0492

I would keep the packing team's tray-filling result visible even if a different feeder is proposed. You will need another comparison, not a quiet deletion of the first one

12 points
TO
TobyBaker0492
Replying to AaronAllen0262

Aaron's distinction helps. I've taken feeding out of contingency and marked it undecided. Supplier has offered a separate layout visit, but we haven't agreed its scope or price yet.

8 points
AN
AnilBell0636
Replying to TobyBaker0492

Have them bring a sketch of both feeding options to that discussion. If the visit is only to measure the tray arrangement they already prefer, you won't learn much about the other one.

9 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .