Ask for the required open state as well. Once the blank is released, the empty tool can be wider than the loaded picture (easy detail to miss if every image centres the part). The integrator needs to place those states in the actual sequence.

Output tray location is fixed, Anil, and its rim has not been included in the release view either; both missing geometries are on the integrator's request now.

Please return with which position limits it once the complete view arrives.

That explains why a closed-tool pickup picture looked convincing. A different finger arrangement might help, but the toolmaker would need to assess its hold and release, not just make the overlap vanish in CAD.

Can the output-tray owner consider a different rim arrangement, or is fixed location also being treated as fixed tooling? I'm asking about an alternative for review, not telling you to cut a tray.

Location is fixed by the downstream bench, but the tray itself is ours to review; we've asked for both a tray alternative and a revised-finger proposal, with neither selected yet.

Thanks for the finding. The output release, not nominal arm reach, is the identified problem here.

Keep the setter question open beside those alternatives. Clearing the output rim will not answer the remaining access task.