I cannot sign off placement from a video of empty fingers
ZaraBennett0743 · 8 Apr 2025, 17:07 UTC
18 replies
Does the seller confirm they received your samples? Establish that first, then request the agreed pick, transfer and release using those samples on the identified supplied setup.
7pointsYes. We have their arrival photograph showing the sample bag and its label. The latest clip contains none of them.
13pointsReference that photograph in the request. Ask for a view where the sample remains visible through pickup and release, with the tooling identification shown clearly.
21pointsSent. Their reply says the movement is the same with or without a part. It misses why we agreed a handling demonstration.
0pointsWere retention and release explicitly in your agreed observations? If so, quoting those lines may get a more useful answer than debating equivalent movement.
5pointsThose are distinct observations. An empty-tool movement cannot show whether the sample stays held or releases into the fixture.
6pointsSame path, different question. Empty fingers never drop a sample. Send them the two lines Harish mentioned.
-4pointsAlso make clear which equipment needs identifying. A replacement clip of samples on their demonstration machine may still leave your delivered package untested.
12pointsDoes your agreement identify the finger drawing revision?
17pointsIf it does, include that revision alongside the sample photo. The person filming should be able to check what must be on the machine before recording.
24pointsThe agreement names the finger revision and a release into our sample fixture. Seller now says they used different fingers for the empty run. I have requested the specified combination.
5pointsHave they proposed a substitution, or simply explained the earlier recording? Those would need different responses from your purchasing and technical reviewers.
12pointsOnly explaining the clip, according to their reply. They say the specified fingers are available. I have not received a substitution proposal.
15pointsThen your existing request still applies; no need to invent an equivalence review for a change they're not proposing.
10pointsAvailable where, though? On a shelf isn't on the arm. I'd want the next clip to start with the fitted fingers visible.
5pointsThe new clip arrived. Correct finger marking is readable, and our samples are picked and released into the fixture. Equipment label is still too blurred to connect the sequence to the ordered package.
15pointsI've acknowledged the handling observations and asked for the remaining equipment identification. Keeping that request short. We are finally down to one missing link.
12pointsAsk for identification connected to that setup, such as a readable view continuing into the assembled machine. A loose label photograph alone may not establish the link you need.
10pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .