I put our old released-failure sheet beside the final pass for the UR5e fixture proposal and noticed the handwritten bracket identifiers differ. Could be a copying error, could be another bracket. I don't want to present that pair as a measured recovery until we know.
Ask quality to trace both identifiers back to the original job and any retained parts. What links the correction entry to either one? A shared folder and similar handwriting won't tell the trainer which bracket was corrected.
Only the folder links them at present. Correction entry names the job but no bracket. I've asked quality to trace the originals and removed the paired before-and-after example from the proposal.
Keep the two observations available with their uncertainty stated, because removing the invented pair should not also erase the released failure that prompted the investigation.
Has quality found the original correction link, Felix, or does the new fixture study still need fresh linked observations rather than that historical pair?