182 housings planned, but our FR10 counter is counting some twice

DanielAllen0304 · 8 Jul 2026, 22:43 UTC

Reply to discussion
DA
DanielAllen0304
Trying to reconcile an inspection batch. Failed checks and reviewed retries are both in the history, which is fine. After restart, the dashboard counts attempts as if they're separate accepted housings. Makes us look nearly finished when we're not. I need a sensible accepted-item view without throwing away the earlier failed checks. Anybody separated these cleanly?

10 replies

AN
AnilBennett0723
Replying to DanielAllen0304

Separate the item from its attempts. One housing can have several inspection records. That does not make it several housings.

4 points
DA
DanielAllen0304
Replying to AnilBennett0723

I get that distinction. The awkward part is a failure followed by a pass: I don't want the latest message automatically becoming acceptance.

22 points
TO
TobyBrooks0840
Replying to DanielAllen0304

Then make the reviewed disposition explicit. Keep attempts underneath the item, but derive the accepted count from the authorised disposition, not whichever result arrived last.

0 points
HA
HanaCarter0970
Replying to DanielAllen0304

I recently had an old completion applied to a new attempt in an offline test. Before changing your totals, check that restart and duplicate delivery cannot attach a result to the wrong attempt in the first place.

8 points
AN
AnilBennett0723
Replying to HanaCarter0970

Hana's point matters. A neat item summary over wrongly linked records is still a wrong count, just harder to spot.

10 points
DA
DanielAllen0304
Replying to HanaCarter0970

Found two issues in the export: repeats with the same attempt ID, plus separate reviewed retries. I had lumped them together as duplicates. They're not.

10 points
TO
TobyBrooks0840
Replying to DanielAllen0304

Use one of each as a worked example for whoever maintains the report. Identical red lines on a screen can mean very different things (repeated delivery versus a genuinely new check).

14 points
HA
HanaCarter0970
Replying to DanielAllen0304

That is exactly why I kept the event history in my test. Removing the repeated rows would have made the total prettier without showing whether the handler could cope when they arrived again.

0 points
DA
DanielAllen0304
Replying to TobyBrooks0840

Thanks Toby, those two examples made the review much easier. We now have attempts and reviewed item disposition shown separately in the draft. Quality still needs to reconcile the outstanding housings, so I'm not posting a new accepted total yet.

11 points
AN
AnilBennett0723
Replying to DanielAllen0304

Put that outstanding number beside the total when it is reconciled. Otherwise planning will read the big accepted figure and miss the work still waiting for a decision.

4 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.