HanaChen1144 · 14 Dec 2025, 21:35 UTC
Ask for the complete proposed sequence from the received stack to release in the nest, with support and single-panel confirmation explained; the seal report can stay as evidence for that one limited check
9 pointsThey've proposed manual separation as one option and a separate feeding arrangement as another. Neither includes the receiving support yet, which seems a fairly large common omission
22 pointsHave the nest designer join that part of the review. The two feeding options may differ, but both still have to deliver a panel the nest can receive without someone straightening it by hand
18 pointsNest designer has asked for the actual held-panel shape and release sequence. We've kept the two preparation options separate for costing and left the transfer assessment open
12 pointsInclude your operator's preparation and refill work in the manual option, so it does not win by leaving the person outside the quoted system
22 pointsHas the tool supplier answered the held-shape question since, Hana? That answer could change either option before you spend more time comparing their prices
10 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .