Our component-case pattern rotates cartons above gaps, despite a preferred support direction. I want the packaging and complete tool-access reviews to use the same actual filled case and load sequence. Which evidence should I request first, before treating the attractive layer count as a design decision?
Cannot accept a UR5e layer pattern without the case support requirement
TheoCarter1019 · 6 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTC
2 replies
Replying to TheoCarter1019
Ask packaging to mark the required bearing for that case construction over the real lower layer and pallet, then have tooling show the whole approach, release and exit through the placement sequence; include permitted short loads and the person removing them, because those gaps aren't explained by a nice top view
13pointsReplying to FelixAdams0110
Packaging confirmed that the pictured insert is obsolete. The current filled case has different bearing requirements, so we have replaced that reference before assessing the rotations. Tooling has the current case and shared drawing; no support or access conclusion yet.
11pointsAdd to the discussion
Welcome to Application Robot
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.