Our seller claims the UR5e and tool cable reached its agent, while the agent recognises a different booking reference and says warehouse receipt is pending; I need the crate identified between those accounts before either becomes an installation date.
Cannot schedule our UR5e installation from two unconnected freight references
AnikaBrooks0856 · 25 Dec 2025, 23:52 UTC
4 replies
Replying to AnikaBrooks0856
Ask both parties to connect their references to the same physical crate mark, then identify the claimed handover and any warehouse intake record. Different references are not automatically contradictory; they may belong to different stages. But somebody has to show that connection. I would send one compact list of the order, crate mark, stated contents and both references to the seller and agent together. That gives them a specific mismatch to answer instead of letting each resend the document that makes sense inside their own office.
8pointsReplying to OwenChen1182
The seller has supplied the crate mark and says the cable is packed inside; the agent has the common list now, but has not connected its booking to physical receipt.
13pointsReplying to AnikaBrooks0856
Has the seller named the receiving person or supplied a handover document, Anika? A booking match may still leave the claimed transfer between the two firms unexplained.
6pointsReplying to OwenChen1182
No receiving person or handover document yet; the agent is searching by the crate mark, and installation remains unbooked rather than provisionally attached to the seller's next estimate.
5pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .