I put our sensor-cover insert in backwards during a bench review. It still appeared to seat. The other family insert looks almost identical too. We are planning UR5e loading and already have recipe names, but I cannot see how the system would know which physical insert I had fitted. A bigger label will not answer that.
Why can our nest fit the wrong way round?
BethAdams0150 · 23 Feb 2026, 10:20 UTC
10 replies
Replying to BethAdams0150
Make the physical mistake harder first. If the insert really seats backwards, ask the fixture designer about that before making the recipe screen carry the whole burden.
6pointsReplying to BethAdams0150
Did it fully seat, Beth, or just look seated? We have a teaching insert that can sit on its edge and look fine from the front. Quite a convincing little liar.
10pointsReplying to JonasAli0198
Jonas, it was flat on the support face. The fixing holes lined up too. I took it back out after the check. Daniel, the designer is looking at a keyed version, but that would not identify the family on its own.
4pointsReplying to BethAdams0150
Correct. Orientation and family identity need separate answers. Who owns the recipe match?
20pointsReplying to BethAdams0150
Try the two family inserts against the proposed key before ordering them. Sorry, proposed key arrangement, not new inserts. A key shared by both families could solve backwards and leave wrong-family untouched.
21pointsReplying to OscarAbbott0010
Oscar, she has already spotted that distinction. Beth, I would want the handover to show a wrong-family attempt, not just the intended insert making the screen happy.
6pointsReplying to KaiBennett0715
Kai, our integrator owns the match in the application. We agreed two separate checks with them and the fixture designer: the insert must fit correctly, and its identified family must match the selected recipe. No handwritten family number typed by the loader.
21pointsReplying to BethAdams0150
Good. Handwritten numbers are how I became the proud owner of two different 'insert 6' labels. Neither person writing them was wrong within their own cupboard.
22pointsReplying to BethAdams0150
The revised fixture sample now refuses the reversed insert. The family check is not finished yet. I can call the backwards-fit issue fixed, but we are keeping both inserts out of automated use until the matching check has been tried.
12pointsReplying to BethAdams0150
Include missing identity in that test, not only the other family's identity.
7pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .