Request sent isn't the same as request seen (part inspection)

AmaraChan1122 · 19 May 2026, 09:06 UTC

Reply to discussion
AM
AmaraChan1122
I'm reviewing our non-safety job handshake for part inspection with Universal Robots UR5e in a PLC-coordinated fixture inspection cell, using a reference plate. The PLC sends a brief request, and our application sometimes misses it. I can't find anything clear about who owns each signal or when it gets cleared. Safety functions are independently engineered; this is the ordinary job interface.

7 replies

NO
NoraAllen0322
Replying to AmaraChan1122

Does your trace show when the PLC request is raised and cleared relative to application polls, including which side performs the clearing?

0 points
AM
AmaraChan1122
Replying to NoraAllen0322

Our trace shows it rising and falling between two polls. The PLC clears it without an observed acknowledgement. No wonder the application misses it.

7 points
NO
NoraAllen0322
Replying to AmaraChan1122

Take an ownership table and a retained-request proposal to the interface owner. A request held until matching acknowledgement should settle the handshake in an offline review.

15 points
NO
NoahArcher0368
Replying to NoraAllen0322

@NoraAllen0322 Holding the request addresses the missed pulse, but it doesn't settle the interface. A retained request needs identity and restart rules to avoid being mistaken for new work.

5 points
NO
NoraAllen0322
Replying to NoahArcher0368

@NoahArcher0368 Yes, I overstated that. Retention addresses the missed pulse. The offline review also needs matching identity, reset ownership and restart cases before the design is complete.

17 points
AM
AmaraChan1122
Replying to NoraAllen0322

@NoraAllen0322 The missed-request diagnosis is settled for this trace. Completing the handshake fix still depends on the interface owner's assessment of signal ownership and the offline transition cases.

6 points
NO
NoraAllen0322
Replying to AmaraChan1122

That diagnosis fits the trace, and you've kept the implementation claim dependent on the interface review.

17 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.