The UR5e inspection lesson calls a cropped bright line a scratch. The full image shows it extending across the faceplate edge into the background. I want the actual retained part checked before this becomes a threshold target.
A crop can make a reflection look wonderfully self-contained. Put it back beside the complete capture and have quality relate the claimed feature to the identified physical faceplate. I've also asked the regular loader to demonstrate the current holder on another comparison; that can reveal ordinary seating variation hidden by carefully selected images.
Quality checked the retained faceplate and found no defect at the captioned location. Whole-part decision retained too. The crop is removed from the scratch examples, and the holder comparison includes the loader rather than only the camera engineer.
Keep a genuine identified reject in that comparison as well as this accepted faceplate. Otherwise a change that suppresses the bright line could look successful without showing whether a real faint scratch remains visible.