The UR5e inspection lesson calls a cropped bright line a scratch. The full image shows it extending across the faceplate edge into the background. I want the actual retained part checked before this becomes a threshold target.
Our faceplate reference crop hides where the bright line starts
LoganBowen · 16 Jan 2026, 06:36 UTC
3 replies
Replying to LoganBowen
A crop can make a reflection look wonderfully self-contained. Put it back beside the complete capture and have quality relate the claimed feature to the identified physical faceplate. I've also asked the regular loader to demonstrate the current holder on another comparison; that can reveal ordinary seating variation hidden by carefully selected images.
11pointsReplying to AlexAli0211
Quality checked the retained faceplate and found no defect at the captioned location. Whole-part decision retained too. The crop is removed from the scratch examples, and the holder comparison includes the loader rather than only the camera engineer.
19pointsReplying to LoganBowen
Keep a genuine identified reject in that comparison as well as this accepted faceplate. Otherwise a change that suppresses the bright line could look successful without showing whether a real faint scratch remains visible.
9pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .