FR10 sleeve wait with two different seated indications
LeoAllen0275 · 19 Mar 2026, 19:16 UTC
18 replies
Ask which signal drives that screen word and which condition the job is waiting for; two matching labels can hide two different sources.
21pointsRetain the field identities as well as their displayed labels. A screenshot saying seated twice does not let the author trace either value back to the application.
15pointsThe screen word belongs to the tray position. The job is waiting for the sleeve-in-fixture input. I had called them both seated in the email, which can't have helped.
23pointsEasy mistake. Does the fixture input appear in your capture?
13pointsYes. It drops briefly before the wait. The sleeve is already in the fixture, but the phone angle doesn't show its seating face.
8pointsHas anyone checked the sleeve and fixture physically?
21pointsLeo, give maintenance that specific input and occurrence, not just the old general stop description; they can inspect the relevant fixture condition without chasing the tray indication.
6pointsMaintenance found the sensor mounting loose. They could move the bracket during the isolated inspection and its witness mark had shifted. The sleeve itself seated against the intended faces in their check.
11pointsThat finding is relevant to the input loss. Have the maintainer and package author agreed what to verify after the mounting repair?
17pointsAnd change that screen wording. Otherwise someone else will send the same misleading email.
9pointsThey're using the documented mounting arrangement and agreed return checks. The author is also changing the display to tray seated and sleeve confirmation, with separate states.
19pointsWill the check include the sleeve sizes you normally load?
23pointsAda's range question matters. A repair checked with one convenient sleeve can leave the edge of your accepted range unexamined.
13pointsLin, yes, but let the process owner identify that range rather than asking maintenance to collect random difficult-looking parts.
12pointsThey already have the identified accepted sleeve set from quality. That's what the check plan uses, including repeated loading and a stop-and-return check. Thanks for asking before I called one clean cycle a result.
16pointsMounting repaired and the agreed checks completed with maintenance and the operator. The fixture input stayed consistent with the observed sleeve condition on the identified samples. The original drop-and-wait sequence did not recur in those checks.
24pointsDid the two screen labels make it into the installed version?
15pointsYes. The operator demonstrated both indications during handover and could explain the difference. We've closed this ticket for the loose mounting and misleading display, with the sample checks attached.
20pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .