Start with the receiving record for what reached you. Match actual labels to the delivery note, then trace the missing identifier through the forwarder's breakdown.
FR10 delivery receipt counts packages but never names our pendant crate
LucyBell0654 · 23 Jun 2026, 19:10 UTC
21 replies
Our label photo shows the arm crate only. The receipt says two packages but does not list either identifier. Stores cannot explain whether that means two crates or the crate plus loose paperwork pack.
7 pointsCould stores record exactly what they saw, separate from what the receipt's quantity means? I have watched people improve a delivery note from memory until it described what ought to have arrived.
23 pointsJohn, yes, and ask the driver or depot for their copy before somebody helpfully makes both copies agree.
8 pointsDoes the forwarder have a house-level packing list with the pendant crate on it?
15 pointsYes, Hana. It lists the arm and pendant crates separately. John and Jo, stores wrote a factual receiving note and retained our original receipt. We have asked for the depot's item-level records.
17 pointsAsk for the cross-reference when they use another warehouse number. A number being created is not receipt, but without its link to your crate they can keep answering the wrong search indefinitely.
7 pointsWho has responsibility for the trace? You should not need to become the forwarding chain's unpaid switchboard.
21 pointsOur contracted forwarder has named a trace contact. They found a breakdown sheet where the pendant crate received a local handling number. No physical location confirmed yet. The seller has supplied its original packing photographs.
1 pointsThat handling number is the next search key. Keep the master delivery status out of the missing-crate conclusion until its actual handovers are reconciled.
11 pointsWe had a loose accessory box arrive on another vehicle once; nobody was looking for its warehouse label, only the order number, which wasn't on the outside.
20 pointsJo, did the label alone prove it was your box, or did you need a contents check? I would be reluctant to close Lucy's shortage on a similar-looking parcel.
25 pointsWe checked contents and references against our list after receiving it; the label only got it to the right bench.
20 pointsThe depot has physically found our pendant crate under that local number. They sent the outer label and original crate identifier together. It was still in their separated-goods area. A delivery booking is being arranged.
19 pointsAnd have they explained the two packages on the original receipt?
22 pointsTheir loading record counted the arm crate and its attached document pack as handling pieces. The pendant crate was not loaded. Forwarder has issued a reconciliation naming those items, while retaining the incorrect original receipt.
12 pointsThat answers the count rather than merely changing it. For the new delivery, give stores the identified contents list and a contact for any mismatch so the parcel does not sit unopened while everyone assumes someone else checked it.
9 pointsHas the booked vehicle actually collected it yet?
16 pointsCollection is now confirmed against the crate identifier. Stores has the packing list and will check the package with our technician on arrival. We are not treating the collection scan as receipt.
8 pointsPendant crate received. Stores and the technician checked the listed pendant package and references; nothing missing from that crate. We closed the freight shortage with the linked records. Thanks Ada, the warehouse-number question finally got the search onto the right item.
9 pointsAdd to the discussion
Welcome to Application Robot
Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.