Quality rejected our retained scratched faceplate and accepted the bright-streak example. The FR5 camera proposal still barely shows the real scratch.
Faceplate label fixed, scratch still faint
RachelChan1131 · 26 Mar 2026, 18:25 UTC
7 replies
Replying to RachelChan1131
Compare the candidate lighting and presentation using both identified plates, keeping the confirmed scratch region and the accepted bright streak visible in the full captures.
17pointsReplying to RosaBrooks0814
One candidate removes the bright streak but hides the scratch almost completely. I've kept that failed comparison.
7pointsReplying to RachelChan1131
Does the holder cover any part of the scratch?
17pointsReplying to GabrielAbbott0018
No. Whole scratch region is exposed. Its contrast changes with the light position.
2pointsReplying to RachelChan1131
Give the imaging engineer those paired captures and the physical plate; the next comparison needs to improve the real defect's visibility without losing the accepted finish examples.
8pointsReplying to RosaBrooks0814
They have both plates and the holder. No threshold selected; we're comparing another lighting arrangement.
2pointsReplying to RachelChan1131
Will the regular loader repeat the chosen presentation too?
6pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .