Clamped bracket readings in the finished-parts column

VictorAllen0272 · 18 May 2025, 23:01 UTC

Closed
VI
VictorAllen0272
I'm reviewing the old bracket folder for a UR5e proposal and the 'finished' column includes checks taken in the jig, followed by a handwritten straightening note; need to know what came out before anyone copies the old correction into the new fixture.

9 replies

EM
EmmaAdams0115
Replying to VictorAllen0272

Can you connect the straightening note to particular parts? I have been sorting a similar folder. A correction written once in the margin looked like a step applied to everything, but the inspection sheets did not establish that.

5 points
VI
VictorAllen0272
Replying to EmmaAdams0115

No part numbers beside it, just an arrow covering several rows; could mean all of them, could mean the troublesome one somebody was talking about.

18 points
EM
EmmaAdams0115
Replying to VictorAllen0272

Then leave that uncertainty visible. I would begin with the rows that identify their measurement condition and part, rather than trying to rescue the whole spreadsheet into one trend.

18 points
CA
CallumChen1143
Replying to VictorAllen0272

I've just found a separate loose-part notebook in another bracket job, so Victor, have you checked whether final inspection kept its own records instead of completing this sheet?

8 points
EM
EmmaAdams0115
Replying to CallumChen1143

Was that notebook linked to the parts, Callum?

12 points
VI
VictorAllen0272
Replying to CallumChen1143

Quality has a final-inspection file, yes, but it covers parts after any straightening; useful acceptance records, still no answer about what the fixture produced on its own.

9 points
CA
CallumChen1143
Replying to EmmaAdams0115

Some entries in ours were linked, Emma, others weren't; we're still working through it and I'm not borrowing the unlinked numbers to fill the gaps.

8 points
VI
VictorAllen0272
Replying to EmmaAdams0115

I've separated the clamped checks, final acceptance and unknown correction history in the review; quality and tooling will define a fresh comparison instead of declaring the old setup proven.

16 points
EM
EmmaAdams0115
Replying to VictorAllen0272

Who will receive that explanation with the new fixture? I would put it beside the old note too. Otherwise somebody opening the folder later may still read the arrow as a requirement.

4 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .