UR5e support review missing the first carton above the gap

HanaChan1057 · 17 Mar 2026, 03:09 UTC

Reply to discussion
HA
HanaChan1057
Our UR5e layer review includes the packed carton and required bearing strips. The completed pattern still conceals an unsupported turned placement halfway through building it. I want packaging and tooling to compare that stage, including withdrawal.

11 replies

KA
KaiChan1063
Replying to HanaChan1057

Is the proposed support supplied by a neighbour placed later, or is that strip still above a gap in the completed layer?

20 points
HA
HanaChan1057
Replying to KaiChan1063

It remains above a gap. The later neighbour only makes the final illustration look enclosed. Packaging's marked section shows the unsupported strip clearly.

11 points
KA
KaiChan1063
Replying to HanaChan1057

Then the first placement and finished layer both need a different arrangement, not a promise to build it faster.

4 points
GR
GraceChen1190
Replying to HanaChan1057

Does the unturned option exist on paper yet?

8 points
HA
HanaChan1057
Replying to GraceChen1190

Yes. It retains the bearing direction, but the old finger withdrawal overlaps its end carton. Tooling is comparing a revised exit with the same packed construction.

16 points
NO
NoahAli0194
Replying to HanaChan1057

Give them the short orders too. A layer completed later and a pallet dispatched partly filled are different operator jobs, even if the last photograph looks similar.

11 points
JA
JaneBaker0510
Replying to NoahAli0194

And where does the partial pallet wait?

19 points
HA
HanaChan1057
Replying to JaneBaker0510

Dispatch uses a marked holding position for orders resumed later. Small completed orders leave partly filled. Both routes and their actual order sizes are in the revised comparison.

4 points
GR
GraceChen1190
Replying to HanaChan1057

Jane's space question matters when the holding position is already occupied

9 points
HA
HanaChan1057
Replying to GraceChen1190

The unturned candidate now has support and full tool exit checked. Dispatch is reviewing the extra pallet exchanges and occupied-holding-position case. We can reject the turned layout, but cannot yet approve the complete alternative job.

7 points
NO
NoahAli0194
Replying to HanaChan1057

Put the two endings in the handover with different wording. Don't make a covering operator call maintenance to discover that a partly filled pallet is finished exactly as intended.

19 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.