VictorAllen0272 · 2 Sept 2025, 22:12 UTC
Who did the correction work on that batch? I'd ask them what actually passed through their bench before trying to extract another answer from the final spreadsheet.
21 pointsTwo fabricators, one still here; he remembers checking every piece and correcting some, but not how many.
11 pointsGet him beside the old fixture if it's still around. Ours had a little stop added that never made the drawing, and the only person who knew why was the one everybody thought was just operating it.
17 pointsI'd still want current samples rather than a room agreeing what they remember; useful background, but you can't get the missing released readings back by interviewing people.
-5 pointsBoth are worth doing. The current trial needs a defined setup, and the old operator may explain a contact or correction you would otherwise copy without understanding. I wouldn't discard that knowledge because it isn't a measurement.
7 pointsIs the old fixture actually available?
4 pointsAnd has anyone already ordered its replacement? Worth making this gap visible to purchasing before the proposal turns into a delivery date.
13 pointsLiam, old fixture is still on a rack; Grace, no replacement order, and purchasing has the hold noted. Amy, current samples are requested, but we need the review scope agreed first.
6 pointsDid the final inspection use the same support points as the clamped check? The dimensions can look directly comparable on a sheet while the part is being held very differently.
12 pointsKeep each bracket's readings linked through the stages when you do the new trial, or you'll end up with three tidy averages and the same missing before-and-after answer.
14 pointsInclude any correction between those readings as an identified operation. Otherwise a later reader may attribute its result to the welding fixture alone, which is the ambiguity you have now.
4 pointsI would give the person writing operator instructions those stages too. Our handover once jumped straight from weld complete to accepted assembly. Nobody reading it could see the separate inspection decision, so every doubtful part became a call to the programmer.
17 pointsAlex, different support points, confirmed with inspection; the clamped check was fit-up only. Ravi and Jane, new trial request now follows piece identities through release, correction if needed, and final acceptance.
13 pointsDoes the old fixture have an undocumented change like Luis described, or is yours still as drawn?
23 pointsAmy, I'm with you on needing new measurements. I just don't want the trial built around a stop nobody has asked about. That was the expensive bit on ours.
10 pointsHassan, there is an extra side stop, and the fabricator is reviewing it with the designer; Emma, trainer gets the full route, not just the final ticks. Still no current trial result.
15 pointsFair enough, Luis, that extra stop is exactly why I wouldn't call the old drawing the setup; Victor, glad you've got the designer looking at the actual thing.
7 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .