Why does our FR10 access sketch end at the aluminium blank?

Fingers and gripper named, adapter depth still unspecified; the machine outline is generic and omits our internal door handle, so both sides of the comparison need completing

Survey the known machine geometry now and keep the missing tool envelope explicit; you can identify definite conflicts without pretending an unspecified adapter clears the remaining space

Let the setter see the stand candidates too. Our robot layout once gave the tool a route and left the person removing the fixture with nowhere comfortable to stand. The drawing had a very fortunate definition of access.

Is fixture removal routine in this job, Aaron, or an occasional maintenance task? Both need access, but their frequency matters to the comparison.

Routine changeover, Ella; setter is comparing that route while tooling defines the adapter, and neither review substitutes for the other

Does the gripper need to release the blank while still inside the machine opening? If so, the open fingers and empty withdrawal belong in the study as well as the loaded approach.

Yes, release is inside the opening; I've included open fingers and empty withdrawal in the request, not only the held blank arriving at its final position

Tie the returned study to the actual assembly revision, so a later adapter choice does not inherit clearance from a different length drawn for convenience

Any usable candidate left after the setter's review, Aaron? Interested whether the machine-side work narrowed it before the complete tool arrived.

The nearer candidate blocks normal fixture removal, so that one is rejected; the farther position is still under full-tool review, with the adapter now defined but the connection route unfinished

Who is supplying that last connection detail? A named open item should help prevent the farther position being treated as approved simply because it is the only candidate left.

Tool supplier owns it and the integrator owns the combined study; no position or arm order accepted, and the setter will see the combined revision before we decide