I have left the arm choice open because the cylindrical blank reaches its fixture in the sketch but most of the tool is missing; how should we compare approach and withdrawal with the actual mill door before the quote acquires an agreed base position?
What assembly has actually been proposed behind the blank: fingers, gripper body, adapter and connection routing? Have the toolmaker identify that complete held arrangement, then combine it with a surveyed opening and door in the access study.
Fingers and gripper named, adapter depth still unspecified; the machine outline is generic and omits our internal door handle, so both sides of the comparison need completing
Survey the known machine geometry now and keep the missing tool envelope explicit; you can identify definite conflicts without pretending an unspecified adapter clears the remaining space
Let the setter see the stand candidates too. Our robot layout once gave the tool a route and left the person removing the fixture with nowhere comfortable to stand. The drawing had a very fortunate definition of access.
Does the gripper need to release the blank while still inside the machine opening? If so, the open fingers and empty withdrawal belong in the study as well as the loaded approach.
Yes, release is inside the opening; I've included open fingers and empty withdrawal in the request, not only the held blank arriving at its final position
Tie the returned study to the actual assembly revision, so a later adapter choice does not inherit clearance from a different length drawn for convenience
The nearer candidate blocks normal fixture removal, so that one is rejected; the farther position is still under full-tool review, with the adapter now defined but the connection route unfinished
Who is supplying that last connection detail? A named open item should help prevent the farther position being treated as approved simply because it is the only candidate left.
Tool supplier owns it and the integrator owns the combined study; no position or arm order accepted, and the setter will see the combined revision before we decide