PriyaIO · 4 Mar 2026, 04:58 UTC
Reconcile those dispositions with the physical batch before replacing the summary. The operator needs to distinguish accepted, held, rejected and not yet inspected items, not merely see a lower total.
12 pointsQuality reconciled 106 accepted, three held, one rejected and two not inspected. Existing attempt identities are intact; the error is in the aggregate. I'm replacing that calculation and preserving the original records for comparison
9 pointsGive the tutor one plate that failed, passed after review and later had acceptance withdrawn, so the operator can see why the current disposition differs from an earlier successful check without treating either record as a mistake.
15 pointsThat example exposed a stale cache in the item panel: total changed on withdrawal, but opening the plate still displayed accepted. Fixed both paths and added the item view to the replay checks
9 pointsCheck the normal restart path and a delayed old success after withdrawal too. A correct fresh calculation is not enough if restoring the session brings back the cached acceptance.
18 pointsInstalled comparison passed normal restart, duplicate attempts, delayed success after withdrawal and a genuine later reviewed acceptance. Current batch remains 106/3/1/2. Quality and shift lead checked the linked item histories; the summary and item panel now agree
5 pointsBy creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.