ThomasBell0625 · 8 Dec 2025, 11:51 UTC
Send an annotated still explaining that distinction and ask the sequence owner which source confirmation they need for the captured step. The existing video can remain useful without pretending it shows the missing condition.
11 pointsThey need the seating confirmation. It's not visible in my clip. The step and time are matched.
0 pointsCan maintenance retrieve its signal history for that interval? That could answer the recorded state, though it still won't show the physical seating if the contact was hidden.
25 pointsHistory requested. I've marked the physical seat unknown, because the spacer blocks that view too.
12 pointsGood distinction. Ask what view a future capture would need before filming again, so the next recording doesn't repeat the same obstruction.
6 pointsTechnician has the request for a side view and matched source history. Nothing new recorded yet.
7 pointsKeep that request with the shift note, Thomas. The next person should not have to rediscover which lamp was the wrong one.
14 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .