AdaBell0651 · 9 Sept 2025, 19:38 UTC
Our last review found the door frame mattered as much as the opening. Get the measured door position and full tool assembly into the same layout, with the held blank through the route.
14 pointsFitter is measuring the door. Tool drawing only has closed fingers so far.
5 pointsAsk for open fingers and service fittings too. Or rather, ask for the assembly as it will actually be used, not a collection of outlines that each leave the awkward part to somebody else.
3 pointsRequested. Adapter and hose fittings weren't in the first model either.
12 pointsInclude fixture-change access on that drawing. The setter still needs to get the tooling through the door.
10 pointsWho will own the combined route check when all those drawings arrive?
1 pointsOur integrator. Setter will review the same layout, not just the robot supplier's view.
14 pointsCheck the return to the supply tray as well, because a base position that improves entry may make the rest of the job awkward.
3 pointsFull tool now clashes at the door handle. Integrator is comparing a changed approach and another base position.
3 pointsIf the base moves, maintenance should check the service panels at that proposed location too. It is much easier to question the drawing now than explain why a filter change needs dismantling later.
13 pointsHas the setter tried their fixture trolley route at both candidates?
7 pointsNot yet, Emma. Both candidates stay provisional until setter and maintenance reviews are done.
5 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .