Our open machine door is missing from the layout

CalebBarnes0580 · 1 Sept 2026, 20:21 UTC

Reply to discussion
CA
CalebBarnes0580
We're considering Fairino FR10 for machining fixture exchange with a rectangular polymer blank in an enclosed machining cell, with 15 planned. The sketch reaches the fixture. Trouble is, we left out the gripper body and open door. I'd like to check access properly before choosing an arm.

14 replies

CH
ChloeBrooks0831
Replying to CalebBarnes0580

Got measured outlines for the opening and gripper? An offline layout might catch what the reach circle misses.

9 points
CA
CalebBarnes0580
Replying to ChloeBrooks0831

@ChloeBrooks0831 Checked them. The approach clips the handle; the workpiece clears. No wonder my first sketch looked so reassuring.

8 points
CH
ChloeBrooks0831
Replying to CalebBarnes0580

Use that measured layout to review the complete approach and retreat offline. Include the tool, cables and service access, then ask the integrator to assess a revised mounting arrangement.

4 points
CA
CalebBarnes0580
Replying to ChloeBrooks0831

@ChloeBrooks0831 The buyer has suggested choosing a larger arm. I'm unsure whether that would address the access issue or simply increase our purchase while leaving the obstruction unresolved.

3 points
CH
ChloeBrooks0831
Replying to CalebBarnes0580

A larger arm should give you more mounting freedom, so that could be the easiest route to investigate.

6 points
NA
NadiaCarter0987
Replying to ChloeBrooks0831

Bigger could bring another obstruction. Extra reach won't shrink the gripper past that handle.

6 points
CH
ChloeBrooks0831
Replying to NadiaCarter0987

@NadiaCarter0987 Yes, I made that sound more certain than it's. Compare candidate geometry in the measured layout; a larger arm is only useful if the complete approach improves.

16 points
MI
MinaAllen0337
Replying to ChloeBrooks0831

@ChloeBrooks0831 We had a different machine application where a good transfer layout put the pedestal across a service panel. Maintenance spotted the catch immediately.

8 points
CA
CalebBarnes0580
Replying to MinaAllen0337

@MinaAllen0337 Your example prompted me to compare our proposed pedestal with the service panel opening. That revealed another overlap to correct in the layout.

9 points
AN
AnnaBaker0503
Replying to CalebBarnes0580

Would making the pedestal removable address service access, or would restoring its position introduce a further setup requirement to evaluate?

7 points
CH
ChloeBrooks0831
Replying to AnnaBaker0503

@AnnaBaker0503 Restoring location and checking the installation would become part of that proposal. Ask the integrator to compare it with a layout that preserves routine service access.

21 points
CA
CalebBarnes0580
Replying to ChloeBrooks0831

@ChloeBrooks0831 The fixture requires a straight approach segment. Should we establish that constraint in the model before exploring alternative positions for the robot base?

15 points
CH
ChloeBrooks0831
Replying to CalebBarnes0580

Yes. Include the required entry direction and withdrawal conditions, not just an end pose. A reachable point can still have no usable approach with the proposed tool.

19 points
MI
MinaAllen0337
Replying to ChloeBrooks0831

For our machine, withdrawal with a held workpiece needed a different route from entry. The empty-tool model made the clearance look much better than it was.

2 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.