Why is the door missing from our FR5 access decision?

DanielAli0217 · 9 Jun 2026, 16:27 UTC

Reply to discussion
DA
DanielAli0217
I need the complete access checked. Our 58-blank loading sketch has no gripper body or open door. What should the supplier add before arm selection?

15 replies

JO
JoBrown0940
Replying to DanielAli0217

Add the full tool and held blank. Does the drawing show withdrawal at all?

8 points
DA
DanielAli0217
Replying to JoBrown0940

Only a target and reach arc. No route through the opening.

17 points
NO
NoraAli0235
Replying to DanielAli0217

Then ask for the route scope. There's more work here than adding one rectangle.

6 points
DA
DanielAli0217
Replying to NoraAli0235

Requested. Supplier wants the door's parked position and complete tool drawing.

8 points
JO
JonasBell0633
Replying to DanielAli0217

We rejected an early position using a measured dummy tool at a stationary machine. It could be a useful first screen for yours, provided nobody treats passing that static check as approval of the robot route.

5 points
JA
JamieAllen0295
Replying to DanielAli0217

Include the setter's fixture trolley while you're measuring, Daniel, because our proposed base once created a marvellous robot approach by blocking the person who changed the fixture

18 points
JO
JoBrown0940
Replying to JonasBell0633

Jonas, what did your dummy hit?

15 points
JO
JonasBell0633
Replying to JoBrown0940

The tool body overlapped a machine-side fitting beside the opening. The fingers alone had cleared it. We kept that rejected position in the review pack so it was not proposed again by someone reading only the original sketch.

22 points
DA
DanielAli0217
Replying to JonasBell0633

Jamie, setter access is going on our layout. Jonas, I'll ask about a dummy screen too.

9 points
DA
DanielAli0217
Replying to DanielAli0217

Complete tool model received. Door handle blocks the original approach. Designer is comparing another orientation.

5 points
NO
NoraAli0235
Replying to DanielAli0217

Does that orientation change the grip on the blank? Toolmaker needs to answer that.

10 points
DA
DanielAli0217
Replying to NoraAli0235

Yes, and toolmaker is reviewing it. No accepted configuration yet.

21 points
JO
JoBrown0940
Replying to DanielAli0217

Has anyone checked where the robot parks for the setter?

5 points
DA
DanielAli0217
Replying to JoBrown0940

Still missing. I've added that explicitly to the review request. Thanks Jo.

13 points
JA
JamieAllen0295
Replying to DanielAli0217

Please post the eventual arrangement, especially the setter access; a loading route can pass every geometric check and still leave a miserable changeover

19 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.