our FR5 ticket has matching times but no explanation of the wait

EmmaBaker0463 · 27 Oct 2025, 22:08 UTC

Closed
EM
EmmaBaker0463
On this housing cell I've kept the original video, screen time and tray identity together from the start, but the seller still replies send more details; what should I ask them to say is missing from the support request?

14 replies

JU
JuliaBrown0935
Replying to EmmaBaker0463

Ask them to identify the stage they cannot interpret and the evidence needed for it. A useful reply might be missing PLC request or unreadable message. Send more details leaves you guessing which extra recording would help.

25 points
OS
OscarAllen0271
Replying to EmmaBaker0463

What does the screen actually say?

1 points
EM
EmmaBaker0463
Replying to OscarAllen0271

Waiting for tray permission, Oscar, and the video shows the housing still in its pocket; Julia, I've asked them which part of that occurrence they cannot interpret.

8 points
MA
MayaChen1171
Replying to EmmaBaker0463

Who supplies tray permission? The seller may be looking at the robot while that signal belongs to somebody else's PLC program.

3 points
JU
JuliaBrown0935
Replying to MayaChen1171

We lost several exchanges that way on a sample handler. The support person kept asking for a fault number because the request had been filed as robot fault. There wasn't one. The machine was waiting for a permission that another program had not issued. That is not a diagnosis of yours, Emma. It is a reason to give the support contact the exact waiting text, even if your original ticket title now sounds too dramatic.

7 points
OS
OscarAllen0271
Replying to JuliaBrown0935

Julia, did one supplier own both programs?

9 points
JU
JuliaBrown0935
Replying to OscarAllen0271

No. Once both were on the call, they found they had different meanings for ready. The first useful change was agreeing the event they were discussing; the program correction came later.

9 points
NA
NadiaCarter0987
Replying to MayaChen1171

Emma, is the tray-permission definition included in your handover? It would help to compare what the screen calls it with the PLC author's intended event.

23 points
EM
EmmaBaker0463
Replying to NadiaCarter0987

The local integrator owns the PLC and calls it tray available, while the seller's list says tray in position; both have been sent the two descriptions, which may or may not mean the same thing.

11 points
MA
MayaChen1171
Replying to EmmaBaker0463

Available could include more conditions than in position. Ask each author to list their conditions rather than choosing one label and assuming the argument is over.

6 points
OS
OscarAllen0271
Replying to EmmaBaker0463

Has either author looked at the captured occurrence yet?

7 points
NA
NadiaCarter0987
Replying to MayaChen1171

Maya, would you put the operator wording alongside those conditions? The current message should lead staff to the right support person, even when they cannot diagnose the PLC.

8 points
EM
EmmaBaker0463
Replying to OscarAllen0271

Oscar, the local author has, seller hasn't confirmed; they now have a joint review invitation but no agreed time, and I have left the cell's intermittent wait unresolved on our support list.

9 points
MA
MayaChen1171
Replying to NadiaCarter0987

Yes, Nadia. Especially if several missing conditions produce the same text. Otherwise the operator can accurately read the message and still be unable to tell anyone what needs attention.

22 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .