Our spacer blocks sit less square in the grip and each recurrence gets another pickup edit. Tray apparently unchanged. I want a sensible inspection order before maintenance inherits a program containing the accumulated opinions of three shifts. No evidence yet that the arm itself is responsible
Our teaching cell once collected offsets around a loose jaw insert, so I would compare the block's seating before closure with its held position before choosing what maintenance should inspect first.
Have maintenance inspect both contacts and the mounting against the tool drawing. Keep the side view with the request so they know where the tilt appears
Keep the pickup edits alongside the physical finding, because the intended replacement contacts may no longer suit somebody's latest compensating offset. One reviewed program should be chosen for verification after restoration.
Several, and one lived only on a laptop somebody took home. The modification dates did not tell us which had run with the repaired tool, so we had to reconstruct that from shift notes.
Yes. Programmer gathered the versions and both shifts have the hold note. Toolmaker has specified the replacement contacts and the mounting check to accompany them
Please report what the supervised verification shows. The contact finding may explain the tilt, but you still want evidence with the restored assembly and the agreed program.
Restored contacts hold square in the supervised checks with the reviewed program. Tray exchange comparison still outstanding. Maintenance has the wear finding and replacement reference, so the offsets won't be the only history left