Our brass-blank loading sketch reaches the fixture but omits the gripper body and open machine door. I cannot choose the FR5 from that. What would establish access through the installed opening, including the service routing rather than only the nominal pickup point?
Installed geometry first. Tool assembly, blank orientation, door at its actual operating position. Put the unknown dimensions on the drawing instead of quietly borrowing them from a catalogue picture.
The machine drawing is generic. The gripper quote specifies a body but leaves the fingers to application design, so neither side presently defines the opening clearance.
And I would involve the setter while access is being defined, because a robot that fits the cycle can still occupy the place needed for clearing or changing the fixture.
Front removal, Priya. Side access is for service, Anil, not our normal fixture change. Both are on the survey request, with the machine lead supplying the door and fixture geometry.
Who is combining the toolmaker's assembly and the machine survey into one review, rather than leaving you to discover the mismatch after two separate approvals?
Our integrator owns the combined review. The setter is reviewing the fixture-change condition separately from the automatic sequence, against that same layout.
Ask for intermediate positions too. Not a picture at the pickup and another outside the machine with the unpleasant journey between them left to your imagination.
Combined model is back. With the surveyed door position, the proposed gripper body intersects the door edge during loaded withdrawal. The pickup pose itself clears, which explains why the original sketch looked convincing.
A shorter adapter is proposed. It is not selected; the toolmaker must confirm the assembly and the integrator must reassess the complete approach and exit.
Both questions remain on the revised-assembly review. We have ruled out the quoted arrangement, not established that the FR5 cannot do the job. No arm selection yet.