Simon_Bailey · 23 Apr 2025, 20:01 UTC
Can you identify which rows are clamped?
24 pointsOnly where the inspector wrote 'in jig'; the other rows have no condition noted.
11 pointsLeave the others unknown, then. Don't sort them by which values look plausible.
18 pointsWho told you the correction helped? Is there a test record somewhere, or are you trying to put numbers behind something people remember saying?
17 pointsI'd like to know that too.
8 pointsThe improvement claim is a note in the project summary, with no linked test; the operator who made the change has left.
17 pointsThen mark the claim unverified in your review.
15 pointsDon't throw the whole folder away though. We had old setup photos that showed a support had moved, even when the inspection sheets were hopeless. Anything identifying what changed could still help the fixture designer.
8 pointsAre the photos tied to fixture revisions?
15 pointsOurs were tied to a work order. No neat revision history, sadly. We could at least show which job used which support position.
6 pointsI found photographs with work-order references, but none records when the correction was introduced; they show the existing arrangement more clearly than the drawing does.
3 pointsDoes the current drawing even match the fixture, then? I'd sort that out before comparing its supposed performance.
10 pointsOne support differs, so the designer will survey the fixture and review its contacts against the part drawing; the old performance claim remains unverified.
2 pointsWho will define the new released-part inspection?
11 pointsOur quality lead, working with the fixture designer; incoming fit-up, clamped checks and final released dimensions will be recorded separately in the proposed trial.
0 pointsThat should make the next review less of an excavation.
18 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .