I am reviewing gusseted-bracket records for a UR5e proposal, but the final column mixes clamped checks with released measurements; how can I establish whether the old fixture correction helped when the inspection condition changes between rows?
Missing released measurements in our bracket history
Simon_Bailey · 23 Apr 2025, 20:01 UTC
16 replies
Replying to Simon_Bailey
Can you identify which rows are clamped?
24pointsReplying to AishaArcher0431
Only where the inspector wrote 'in jig'; the other rows have no condition noted.
11pointsReplying to Simon_Bailey
Leave the others unknown, then. Don't sort them by which values look plausible.
18pointsReplying to Simon_Bailey
Who told you the correction helped? Is there a test record somewhere, or are you trying to put numbers behind something people remember saying?
17pointsReplying to NathanBrooks0808
I'd like to know that too.
8pointsReplying to NathanBrooks0808
The improvement claim is a note in the project summary, with no linked test; the operator who made the change has left.
17pointsReplying to Simon_Bailey
Then mark the claim unverified in your review.
15pointsReplying to Simon_Bailey
Don't throw the whole folder away though. We had old setup photos that showed a support had moved, even when the inspection sheets were hopeless. Anything identifying what changed could still help the fixture designer.
8pointsReplying to NinaChen1197
Are the photos tied to fixture revisions?
15pointsReplying to EmmaBarnes0550
Ours were tied to a work order. No neat revision history, sadly. We could at least show which job used which support position.
6pointsReplying to NinaChen1197
I found photographs with work-order references, but none records when the correction was introduced; they show the existing arrangement more clearly than the drawing does.
3pointsReplying to Simon_Bailey
Does the current drawing even match the fixture, then? I'd sort that out before comparing its supposed performance.
10pointsReplying to NathanBrooks0808
One support differs, so the designer will survey the fixture and review its contacts against the part drawing; the old performance claim remains unverified.
2pointsReplying to Simon_Bailey
Who will define the new released-part inspection?
11pointsReplying to AishaArcher0431
Our quality lead, working with the fixture designer; incoming fit-up, clamped checks and final released dimensions will be recorded separately in the proposed trial.
0pointsReplying to Simon_Bailey
That should make the next review less of an excavation.
18pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .