How should we compare two FR10 housing tools with different offsets?

MayaAli0214 · 7 May 2026, 11:25 UTC

Reply to discussion
MA
MayaAli0214
One supplier offers a longer finger set to reach our existing inspection nest. The other offers a shorter tool but expects us to move the nest support. Both summaries justify the FR10 from housing mass alone, so I have asked for their complete loaded-tool details. The support move is not agreed. How do I keep that uncertainty visible without throwing away a potentially useful option?

19 replies

IS
IsabelCarter0996
Replying to MayaAli0214

List the support change as part of that offer, with an owner and cost still to be agreed. Who is assessing whether the altered nest position works for inspection?

9 points
MA
MayaAli0214
Replying to IsabelCarter0996

Our inspection lead. She has the proposed position but not a section showing the tool releasing the housing. That is now requested from the supplier.

12 points
NO
NoraBennett0757
Replying to MayaAli0214

We nearly bought a shorter tool on the assumption that a bench could move, then found its services were fixed through the floor... ask the person who actually looks after that support before the cheaper column becomes the favourite.

21 points
AN
AnikaBrown0943
Replying to MayaAli0214

Unknown cost stays unknown. Don't put zero in because the spreadsheet wants a number.

8 points
AM
AmaraArcher0426
Replying to MayaAli0214

Do both quotes include the adapter and connections?

12 points
MA
MayaAli0214
Replying to AmaraArcher0426

Yes in the price, Amara, but not yet in the mass breakdown. Nora, maintenance has checked the support location; services can be rerouted, with that work added to the second offer.

7 points
IS
IsabelCarter0996
Replying to MayaAli0214

Keep the actual loaded centre of gravity and other required load data tied to the quoted assembly as well. Your integrator needs those for the intended movement, not a supplier's housing-only summary.

6 points
NO
NoraBennett0757
Replying to MayaAli0214

Is the move still worth considering after the extra work?

18 points
AN
AnikaBrown0943
Replying to NoraBennett0757

Nora, she hasn't got a workable release view yet. Price can wait for that.

14 points
AM
AmaraArcher0426
Replying to AnikaBrown0943

I'd still collect the price. Might save assessing something we could never afford.

19 points
MA
MayaAli0214
Replying to AnikaBrown0943

Both are moving together. The release section shows the short tool fits, but the changed support puts the gauge access behind it. Inspection has rejected that position. The supplier is offering a further support revision, not a finished solution.

2 points
NO
NoraBennett0757
Replying to AnikaBrown0943

That was why I asked, Anika; endless redesign isn't free either, even before anyone cuts metal.

5 points
MA
MayaAli0214
Replying to MayaAli0214

The revised support restores gauge access, but it needs a larger base and costs more than the long-tool option. Both complete loaded assemblies are now with the integrator for assessment.

18 points
IS
IsabelCarter0996
Replying to MayaAli0214

Does the longer assembly leave room for the empty tool to withdraw and for the nest to be changed? Those could still decide it even if the load assessment is satisfactory.

13 points
AN
AnikaBrown0943
Replying to NoraBennett0757

Fair enough, Nora. I read your price question as a vote for the unfinished option.

19 points
MA
MayaAli0214
Replying to IsabelCarter0996

The long-tool model covers both, with inspection and maintenance accepting the access. The integrator has accepted its defined load and motion proposal. We have chosen it and dropped the support move from this purchase.

12 points
AM
AmaraArcher0426
Replying to MayaAli0214

Did the final order keep the assessed tool revision?

23 points
MA
MayaAli0214
Replying to AmaraArcher0426

Yes, the order identifies that assembly and the existing nest revision, with installation and acceptance work included. Thanks, Amara. The generic lightweight-gripper description has been replaced.

17 points
NO
NoraBennett0757
Replying to MayaAli0214

Good to hear the existing nest won for an actual reason, rather than just being the thing nobody wanted to move.

11 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.