Can't choose the FR5 position from this finished-blank sketch

MayaParts · 9 Aug 2025, 03:08 UTC

Closed
MA
MayaParts
I'm buying for another unloading proposal and the FR5 sketch gets our polymer blank out of the fixture but leaves the gripper off, with the open door taking up the space where I think the wrist would go; what do I need before accepting a base position?

21 replies

AN
AnikaBennett0769
Replying to MayaParts

Ask for the loaded gripper, adapter and actual open door in one drawing, then have the integrator show withdrawal as well as the final pose

13points
MA
MayaParts
Replying to AnikaBennett0769

They have added the fingers but not the adapter, which is listed as supplied to suit, so I still cannot tell where the wrist ends up.

11points
AN
AnikaBennett0769
Replying to MayaParts

Supplied to suit needs a proposed shape before this choice can move on. Is someone actually designing that adapter, or is each supplier expecting the other to?

8points
MA
MayaParts
Replying to AnikaBennett0769

Gripper supplier thought the integrator was doing it, integrator thought it came with the fingers; they have now agreed the integrator will provide the first assembly drawing.

9points
RE
RebeccaAdams0169
Replying to MayaParts

Classic. Is that drawing included in your price?

9points
ZA
ZaraBrown0917
Replying to MayaParts

And can you still change the fixture with that base there? Ours looked fine until the setter brought the lifting aid round.

14points
MA
MayaParts
Replying to RebeccaAdams0169

Rebecca, the design is included but manufacture was provisional; Zara, I have asked the setter to check the changeover space before we settle the position.

4points
LI
LinBaker0444
Replying to AnikaBennett0769

Don't settle it from a single side view. We had a tidy-looking unloading line that ignored the door handle sticking towards the tool. Actual hardware is annoyingly three-dimensional.

16points
MA
MayaParts
Replying to LinBaker0444

The fuller drawing shows a clash at the door handle, Lin, and the integrator has offered a farther base position or a different approach with the same base, both still being reviewed.

12points
RE
RebeccaAdams0169
Replying to MayaParts

Farther where? Towards a cabinet somebody opens?

14points
AN
AnikaBennett0769
Replying to MayaParts

Compare both proposals with the complete tool, not the farther base with the old bare-blank sketch. Did the approach change also alter finger shape?

20points
MA
MayaParts
Replying to AnikaBennett0769

Anika, same fingers and adapter in both proposals; Rebecca, farther along the machine side, where the electrical cabinet opens, so maintenance has that option to check.

9points
ZA
ZaraBrown0917
Replying to MayaParts

I'd keep the original base in contention then. Moving it sounds simple until everyone else's access moves with it. No preference on the robot motion, that's for your integrator.

19points
LI
LinBaker0444
Replying to ZaraBrown0917

The original position can still be the worse option. Different approach might need more room inside the machine, so price both after somebody has checked the whole route.

0points
MA
MayaParts
Replying to LinBaker0444

That is what I've requested, Lin; the revised approach needs checking past a fixture clamp, and the other position needs cabinet and setter access, neither has been accepted.

13points
ZA
ZaraBrown0917
Replying to MayaParts

Any news from the setter? That's the bit I'd like to hear about.

7points
RE
RebeccaAdams0169
Replying to MayaParts

Does the farther option leave room to remove the cabinet panel too?

9points
AN
AnikaBennett0769
Replying to RebeccaAdams0169

Rebecca's panel question belongs on the maintenance review. An open door can fit while the panel removal job still has nowhere to go

12points
MA
MayaParts
Replying to ZaraBrown0917

Zara, the setter can change the fixture at the original position; Rebecca and Anika, maintenance ruled out the farther proposal because panel removal space is lost, so the changed approach is still under review.

14points
AN
AnikaBennett0769
Replying to MayaParts

Useful result, even without an arm decision. Has the integrator returned the clamp-clearance check for the remaining approach?

16points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .