Puck tilting in one UR5e finger despite repeated point changes

LiamAli0229 · 25 Mar 2026, 20:18 UTC

Closed
LI
LiamAli0229
Our aluminium puck used to sit square in the gripper. Now one edge rides higher, and the last two pickup-point changes have only helped for a short time. The tray stops look untouched. I have saved the earlier job versions. Before we compare them, I want maintenance to check the actual puck, seat and fingers. Or rather, I want us to stop treating an unchanged-looking tray as proof that all the hardware is unchanged. What would give us a useful first comparison?

19 replies

AA
AaronBennett0697
Replying to LiamAli0229

Use an identified puck that behaved properly before, if you still have one. Does it sit the same way in the stationary tooling now? Don't start by changing the program again.

21points
LI
LiamAli0229
Replying to AaronBennett0697

We retained the first-piece puck. Maintenance compared it with a current one in the stationary setup. Both sit evenly in the tray, and both tilt against the same finger.

1points
JA
JaneAdams0162
Replying to LiamAli0229

What did they find on that finger? I have a crooked-block case too; appearance alone has not told us which contact changed.

22points
LI
LiamAli0229
Replying to JaneAdams0162

The replaceable contact on that side sits slightly proud at one end. We have an assembly drawing to compare it with, but nobody has yet checked the locating face underneath.

5points
CH
ChenBarnes0529
Replying to LiamAli0229

I'd wait for that check before ordering softer contacts. We bought softer ones for a similar-looking problem and they just bent around the bad seating. Lovely grip marks, same crooked part.

15points
TH
ThomasArcher0364
Replying to LiamAli0229

Did the contact get replaced before the first pickup correction, Liam, or are you only now discovering an older assembly issue?

23points
AA
AaronBennett0697
Replying to ChenBarnes0529

Chen, that is useful. Was your underlying seating issue obvious once the contact came off, or did the drawing comparison expose it?

14points
CH
ChenBarnes0529
Replying to AaronBennett0697

A trapped chip under the contact. Obvious after removal, invisible from our usual viewing side. We had been admiring the outside finish of the fingers while the problem sat behind it.

11points
LI
LiamAli0229
Replying to ThomasArcher0364

Thomas, it was replaced before the first correction. Maintenance found a locating bush not seated as the assembly drawing requires, lifting that end of the contact. They have stopped there to agree the proper restoration with the tooling author.

12points
JA
JaneAdams0162
Replying to LiamAli0229

Have they restored it now, Liam? Interested in whether both pucks then sit square without another point change.

8points
TH
ThomasArcher0364
Replying to LiamAli0229

And which saved point set will be used for the handling comparison, since the later ones were taught around the tilted contact?

8points
LI
LiamAli0229
Replying to ThomasArcher0364

The contact is restored and both pucks sit square in the stationary check. Thomas, the integrator has selected the identified pre-correction job for the agreed comparison. We are not just picking the oldest file by its name.

14points
CH
ChenBarnes0529
Replying to LiamAli0229

That sounds less expensive than a new gripper. Have you also got a way to recognise the properly seated contact next time it is replaced?

6points
JA
JaneAdams0162
Replying to ChenBarnes0529

Chen's last point is the one I'd take into handover. Otherwise the saved corrected points are waiting to be rediscovered as a convenient fix.

12points
LI
LiamAli0229
Replying to ChenBarnes0529

The replacement instruction now shows the locating bush and seating check. We also marked the two compensation versions as superseded, with the reason. The full handling comparison is booked with the integrator, not completed yet.

15points
TH
ThomasArcher0364
Replying to LiamAli0229

Will that comparison include the current pucks and ordinary tray positions as well as the retained first piece?

17points
AA
AaronBennett0697
Replying to ThomasArcher0364

I'd include the release into the receiving pocket too. A square pickup is encouraging, but that is only the start of the transfer.

13points
LI
LiamAli0229
Replying to AaronBennett0697

Completed with the retained puck and current samples across the agreed tray positions, including release at the receiver. No tilting or seating failures in that comparison. We accepted the restored assembly with the identified job; the point changes are out of use. Thanks, Chen, your story made us look behind the contact before buying anything.

9points
CH
ChenBarnes0529
Replying to LiamAli0229

Good to hear. Much better ending than my box of unnecessary soft contacts.

17points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .