HassanBarnes0530 · 19 Aug 2025, 12:45 UTC
Packaging, with the actual filled box details. Don't let anyone wave it away with alternating is stronger. They need to look at what supports these particular boxes.
13 pointsThey've asked for the layer drawing and a filled sample, so we're holding the pattern rather than trying to fix the gap ourselves
17 pointsCould you put the tool's finger space on that same drawing? We had packaging close a gap that the tool designer had deliberately left, then everyone thought the other person was being difficult.
11 pointsYes, Jamie, the gap is there for finger withdrawal on ours too; thank you, that explains why sending only the box outlines was a poor start
-2 pointsThen get both people looking at it together. Packaging can't conjure support into a finger gap, and the tool designer can't wish the gap smaller after the fingers are made.
19 pointsThey are comparing a different tool approach and a lower-count layer, neither chosen yet; at least both options now include the filled-box support detail
8 pointsLeave the original pattern out of the approved folder while they compare. Otherwise someone will grab the familiar picture and you'll have this conversation twice.
22 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .