RuthBailey · 12 Sept 2025, 09:53 UTC
Ask for the exact message, active step and time from the same pause, with the fixture identity. Then describe where the housing is without naming a failed component yet.
6 pointsI can supply unit and program identifiers now, but the old message is lost; the operator remembers destination waiting, which I am leaving as a recollection rather than putting it in quotation marks.
9 pointsKeep that recollection beside the old clip, but do not turn it into the exact message for a new event just because the stopped pose looks similar.
21 pointsWho can collect the next occurrence when you're not there?
11 pointsWe once captured the right message and the wrong fixture name. Put a photo of the actual fixture identifier in the report if there is one, rather than using whichever name the shift happens to call it.
8 pointsAnd who has the seller's answer afterwards, the shift lead or just your inbox?
16 pointsLuis and Nathan, shift lead owns capture and the shared ticket; Jonas, the new occurrence includes fixture D6's label, with a waiting for destination positioned message at unload-place and the same-occurrence time.
2 pointsAsk controls what destination positioned means in this program, since the name may combine several conditions rather than point to one detector.
15 pointsThat is the question I'd put to support too, with D6 and the program version. The new capture gives them a specific sequence condition to explain.
6 pointsDo you have the input state from that same occurrence, or only a screenshot taken after someone moved the destination back?
12 pointsSame occurrence, Aaron; controls says one destination-location input is missing, and maintenance is checking the D6 target arrangement before we change any sequence handling.
1 pointsKeep the supplied drawing revision with that inspection. On ours a target looked displaced until we found the drawing described an older fixture, so the visible difference alone had sent us towards the wrong repair.
18 pointsMaintenance has D6 revision C, matching its identification, and found a loose target mounting; repair is proposed but not completed, with the original gripper-fault title corrected in the shared ticket.
12 pointsWill the shift lead get the repair and trial result before the ticket gets closed?
21 pointsAnd keep the old clip unmatched in that final explanation; a useful finding on D6 should not silently become the cause of every previous pause.
18 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .