I obtained an FR10 package quote for unloading moulded mounting blocks, then treated it as the cost of a pilot. My colleague pointed out that our fixture is only a sketch and her operator would spend time helping. How can I bound the trial so we can judge the idea fairly?
I have put fixture design and manufacture into separate estimate lines. Operator time is harder for me to estimate because we haven't agreed how much setup the supplier will do.
Their quote says installation assistance, with no task list. I'll ask which fixture, tooling and program tasks they own before assigning our internal hours.
Who would take over the pilot if your colleague's usual operator is absent? On our teaching jobs the apparent saving often depended on one person being available to explain every interruption.
For a first estimate, list preparation, supervised running, clearing a normal interruption through the approved procedure, and changeover as separate activities; people can estimate a task much more easily than a mysterious block called support.
I've added those activities to the draft. We have one operator and one maintenance contact proposed, but neither has reviewed the hours. I won't present those numbers as agreed staffing.
What are you comparing it against? I can run a small batch quickly if somebody else brings every part and clears the bench afterwards. Manual baseline needs the same boundaries.
Would the operator help record that manual order before the supplier visit? It gives them a proper say in what counts as work, and you get a baseline everyone can recognise.
That is going into the proposal. One block variant, whole-order timing, named setup tasks and a limit on staff hours. We still need the supplier's task list and my colleague's agreement before this becomes an approved pilot.