Is the tool already selected, or are its dimensions still provisional? That determines what information the designer can use for the first complete layout.
Another mill, another door missing from the loading sketch
ElliotBrown0944 · 8 May 2025, 17:00 UTC
19 replies
Selected gripper body. Fingers still being designed. We know their required contact on the blank but not the final outside shape.
7 pointsAsk the toolmaker for an agreed provisional envelope, including the open state. Have the reviewer list the dimensions that still require confirmation before arm selection.
23 pointsToolmaker will do that. The machine owner is also measuring the actual opening; its handle differs from the catalogue drawing.
16 pointsWhere will the base stand relative to the fixture?
7 pointsI would pause the base choice until the fingers are further along, because long fingers designed around an early base position can leave you paying to rescue that first layout. Is there a reason the arm has to be selected now?
7 pointsPurchasing wants to reserve workshop installation time. No technical reason to fix the base today. We can make the reservation conditional on the access review.
13 pointsDo that. A calendar booking shouldn't design the tool.
16 pointsAgreed. Proposed base is left of the opening, with a second position farther out. Both remain candidates, and the tooling envelope is now attached to them.
20 pointsCan the operator still get the fixture out from the left?
9 pointsCheck the part withdrawal through the door as well as its final loaded position. Does the planned sequence turn the steel blank inside the machine?
14 pointsNo internal turn in this sequence. The setter wants the farther base to preserve fixture removal space. Integrator is studying that candidate first.
8 pointsDoes the drawing include any fixed fittings on the inside face of the open door? Those can be missed when only the door thickness is shown.
7 pointsOur door had a hose clip exactly where the empty drawing said clear.
19 pointsThe measured layout includes the handle and internal hose bracket. Thanks for raising those; the first catalogue outline showed neither.
21 pointsHow much of the finger envelope is now fixed? I am still wary of an arm decision based on a generous-looking drawing that the final tool cannot satisfy.
5 pointsAnd did the setter actually try the fixture trolley at that farther spot?
6 pointsTrolley access checked on the floor marking. Finger contact geometry is fixed; hose routing is not. The review therefore remains provisional and purchasing has no final arm approval.
16 pointsFair enough. I'd like to hear how the final tool fits when the routing is settled.
21 pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .