Yes. I have both drawings open. Some marked edges cross spaces between the cartons below. I can't tell whether the packaging design allows that span.

That allowance needs the packaging owner's answer before the layer is accepted.

And don't let a drawing that fits all the rectangles stand in for that answer. What load is inside the case? The bottom support requirement presumably exists for a reason.

The packing specification should identify that load, including any internal supports.

Good question. The drawing note may define a narrower condition than we're assuming.

It says base support during stacking. Internal trays carry the product, but I don't have their drawing. I've asked packaging to clarify the support note and provide the tray details.

Will the integrator see that answer too? We once corrected the packing layout and left the tool designer staring at yesterday's neat rectangles.

Both are on the same review request. I included the proposed side gripper outline, though its drawing only shows the closed position.

Ask for the open position as well. The neighbours don't kindly move aside when the fingers release a carton.

And the sequence of placements matters; the neighbours present at release depend on it.

I'll add placement order to the request. We only have a finished-layer picture. It doesn't tell the tool reviewer which spaces are still empty.

That's the missing movement story. A complete layer can be geometrically possible and awkward to build with the proposed tool. Packaging and integration need to agree on something that can actually be stacked.

I've listed those as unresolved items on the review. No claim yet that rotation is wrong; we don't have enough detail to approve it either.

Could you post how packaging interprets those arrows when they reply? Useful detail to learn.

I haven't got an interpretation I can share yet. The diagram is still a proposal, not an approved layer. I'll bring the actual answer back when I have it.

Keep the sketch with that answer. 'Support underneath' can hide the whole argument.