I cannot accept our proposed UR5e dispatch-carton pattern from its top view alone. Rotated cartons bridge gaps despite a preferred support direction. I want packaging and tooling to examine the same arrangement; what evidence should accompany the drawing?
What establishes where the loaded carton bears its weight? Bring that packaging evidence, the lower layer beneath the rotated positions and the complete tool's release space together. The printed direction is not an assessment of the particular gaps you have drawn.
Only the carton direction is documented so far. I've requested the loaded-case support requirements from packaging and a section through the questionable positions. The pattern remains a proposal while that information is missing.
Put the placement order on that same submission. Tooling needs to see which neighbouring cartons are present when it opens and withdraws, not an empty pallet at every position. Ask both reviewers to identify the layout revision their findings concern.