ImranAli0218 · 17 Apr 2026, 05:28 UTC
Look at the puck before the fingers touch it. If it already leans, maintenance has a different starting point from one that turns during grip. Keep that puck identified for the comparison
25 pointsAlready leaning in one pocket. Same puck sits flat in another.
6 pointsHas anyone looked at the bottom of the affected pocket? Keep it as found for maintenance, before a helpful wipe removes whatever explains it.
14 pointsDamaged insert edge, not debris. Maintenance photographed it and removed the insert.
18 pointsWas that insert the intended reference?
21 pointsThomas's question is useful. Compare its shape and mounting with the drawing before ordering the same thing again. A familiar tray label doesn't identify every replaceable bit inside it
6 pointsIntended reference. Tooling confirms impact damage. Replacement approved to the existing drawing.
18 pointsGive controls the physical finding and the saved pickup versions. The repaired seat should not return carrying compensation for the damaged one. Then include receiving release in the agreed return checks.
17 pointsReplacement fitted. Controls has the versions and is reviewing them with the integrator.
13 pointsDoes the setter get a useful damage example for changeover?
15 pointsAnd who supplies the next checked insert if it happens again?
10 pointsStores holds the checked spare. Setter's draft includes the damaged edge and call to maintenance.
11 pointsKeep marginal condition decisions with maintenance and tooling. The setter can recognise this damage without being asked to invent a wear limit from the photograph.
12 pointsHas the complete handling check happened yet, Imran? Interested whether the repaired seat removes the later tilt as well as the initial lean.
10 pointsBy creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.