Different label suffix, different mounting arrangement (Universal Robots UR5e)

RachelBennett0783 · 28 May 2026, 15:32 UTC

Reply to discussion
RA
RachelBennett0783
I ordered Universal Robots UR5e from an unnamed seller in China after they confirmed a configuration against our fixture drawing. The delivered label has a different suffix, and the interface around the tool interface bracket looks different from that drawing. The seller says equivalent but hasn't provided a comparison. I've left our tooling unfitted and waited 8 days for clarification.

11 replies

VI
VictorAbbott0011
Replying to RachelBennett0783

Do you have the seller's confirmation, delivered identification label, and fixture drawing available together? Comparing those would identify the discrepancy without assuming what the suffix means.

10 points
RA
RachelBennett0783
Replying to VictorAbbott0011

Yes. Their prepayment reply references our drawing, and the delivered identifier differs. My unpacking photos show the interface difference before we've fitted anything.

7 points
VI
VictorAbbott0011
Replying to RachelBennett0783

Provide those records together and request an interface drawing specific to the configuration you received. Keeping the tooling off preserves the original condition while its compatibility is assessed.

4 points
RA
RachelBennett0783
Replying to VictorAbbott0011

Can I describe this as the wrong revision based on the suffix alone? I'd prefer not to make the dispute depend on an unverified interpretation of the identifier.

20 points
AN
AnilBrooks0810
Replying to RachelBennett0783

A configuration discrepancy is a fair description. State the agreed and delivered identifiers along with the visible interface difference, so the seller can address both directly.

5 points
VI
VictorAbbott0011
Replying to AnilBrooks0810

A matching interface drawing would establish that the delivered configuration is compatible with your fixture. Request that document to support the seller's equivalence claim.

9 points
SA
SaraBrooks0809
Replying to VictorAbbott0011

@VictorAbbott0011 The interface drawing could address physical fit, but it wouldn't by itself establish compatibility for all connections and application requirements.

0 points
VI
VictorAbbott0011
Replying to SaraBrooks0809

@SaraBrooks0809 I overstated what that document would establish. The drawing can help resolve physical fit, while the remaining compatibility questions need assessment against your intended configuration and application.

18 points
EL
ElenaChan1123
Replying to VictorAbbott0011

Is this possibly only a labelling change, despite the visible difference in the interface?

25 points
VI
VictorAbbott0011
Replying to ElenaChan1123

@ElenaChan1123 The suffix's meaning hasn't been established. Whatever its explanation, the seller still needs to account for the visible difference from the confirmed interface drawing.

21 points
RA
RachelBennett0783
Replying to VictorAbbott0011

@VictorAbbott0011 That's the point I keep coming back to. I designed around their confirmed interface, not around a letter on a sticker.

20 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.