The old bracket notes separate restrained and released readings, but the fixture number stayed the same after its locating blocks changed. I cannot connect the later correction entries to either block set. What can we use in the new FR5 review without guessing that missing link?
Separate the records whose fixture configuration is known from those whose block revision is unresolved. Retain the correction as an operation where it is recorded, but do not assign its outcome to one block set merely because the dates seem convenient.
Stores has both block sets and their issue dates. Issue date doesn't establish which was fitted. Three setup photographs show enough detail to identify the older set.
Two link to marked brackets through their setup sheets. Third has no reliable job link. We can use the first two as cases, not as evidence for the whole batch.
Give the reviewer the actual block differences and intended locating contacts too. The old case can be informative without establishing how the revised set should behave or why correction was needed.
Yes, both were selected after poor released readings. I've marked that selection. No pass-rate estimate from these two, and the revised set still needs its own agreed comparison.
Has the review owner agreed which new measurements will connect fit-up, fixture location, released dimensions and any correction? Your reconstructed examples should help frame that work, not postpone it indefinitely.