MayaBarnes0562 · 8 Sept 2025, 19:58 UTC
Can the person who made the original checks identify any retained pieces from before correction, rather than having you search the accepted stock for something that looks representative?
7 pointsInspector knows of a sample box. Label just says brackets, which is promisingly vague.
7 pointsCan its contents be linked to the batch and drawing revision under review? A retained piece without that link may not answer your missing measurement.
16 pointsI'd price a small current-sample check while you search, because this can turn into a long hunt for data nobody recorded
-4 pointsDineshBennett, requested that estimate. Harish, the inspector is checking the box history before we use anything.
8 pointsKeep the old route useful for what it can tell you too; knowing every batch visited correction still matters to planning, even if the individual before readings are gone.
9 pointsHas the new fixture designer seen the actual old checking arrangement? I would ask that before deciding the missing number is the only question left.
19 pointsNot yet, Lucy. Old checking block is stored with inspection. Designer has only the drawing.
7 pointsWhich revision is that drawing, Maya? Earlier you mentioned a proposal, but not whether it uses the same bracket revision as the old records.
14 pointsOld record and checking-block drawing reference C. Proposed bracket is E. Slot position changed at D.
13 pointsHave the designer review that change against the checking contacts. Don't ask someone to measure E on the old block merely because it fits there.
8 pointsInclude defining the current measurement setup in that sample-check estimate, otherwise we're pricing a number without agreeing how to obtain it
0 pointsThe box is all corrected samples, inspector confirms. Useful to know, annoying to find nothing untouched.
15 pointsAt least that stops the box being used as before evidence; will the current trial keep individual identities from the first released check onward?
2 pointsYes. First release, any correction, then final check under the agreed method. Each piece stays identified.
16 pointsIs that method agreed now, or part of the trial request? I cannot tell from your last update.
16 pointsPart of the request, Harish. Wrote that too firmly. Inspection and designer still have to agree it.
11 pointsThen keep the sample measurement waiting on that agreement. You can still finish the records summary without pretending the new method is ready.
15 pointsDone. Old history summarised, current method still pending. Thanks DineshAdams for the retained-piece question; it stopped that box becoming our answer by default.
11 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .