I found two inspection sheets for our gusseted support bracket. One says square in jig. The other gives an out-of-tolerance hole-to-base measurement after the part was removed. Neither identifies the bracket, so I cannot tell whether they describe the same piece.
Our FR5 fixture proposal cites them as a before-and-after comparison. I would rather ask inspection one useful question now than commission a fixture around a story we cannot trace. Is there anything worth recovering from these sheets?
We once recovered a link from a job traveller kept outside the inspection folder, so I would ask whether the sheet numbers appear on anything that identifies the batch or part.
The traveller links both sheets to the same batch, Sarah, but not an individual bracket. Farah, the jig check was a stop-contact check. It did not measure hole-to-base distance.
Keep the failed final measurement available. I mean do not discard it with the attempted comparison; someone still needs to account for that failure when planning the work.
That is the useful split. I have removed the before-and-after claim from our brief and left the final failure as an unresolved example. We are asking inspection to choose a current comparison on identified parts.
Both use revision F. The old sheet states it, and I checked the proposal attachment. Thank you for pushing the traceability question before we built a convincing chart from unrelated checks.